What are the environmental factors of interest?

1. World Health Organization (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2001. [Google Scholar]

2. WHO and World Bank . World Report on Disability 2011. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2011. [Google Scholar]

3. Bostan C., Oberhauser C., Stucki G., Bickenbach J., Cieza A. Which environmental factors are associated with lived health when controlling for biological health?—A multilevel analysis. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:508. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1834-y. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

4. United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. [(accessed on 3 July 2015)]. Available online: http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml

5. Coenen M., Cieza A., Officer A., Posarac A., Bickenbach J., Chatterji S., Kostanjsek N., Sabariego C. How is disability being assessed worldwide? A content examination of selected disability and health surveys using the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) as a framework. Int. J. Public Health. 2016 under review. [Google Scholar]

6. Sabariego C., Oberhauser C., Posarac A., Bickenbach J., Kostanjsek N., Chatterji S., Officer A., Coenen M., Chhan L., Cieza A. Measuring disability: Comparing the impact of two data collection approaches on disability rates. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2015;12:10329–10351. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120910329. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

7. Power M.J., Green A.M. The attitudes to disability scale (ads): Development and psychometric properties. J. Intellect Disabil Res. 2010;54:860–874. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01317.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

8. Ocarino J.M., Gonçalves G.G.P., Vaz D.V., Cabral A.A.V., Porto J.V., Silva M.T. Correlation between a functional performance questionnaire and physical capability tests among patients with low back pain. Rev. Bras. Fisioter. 2009;13:343–349. doi: 10.1590/S1413-35552009005000046. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

9. Bostan C., Oberhauser C., Stucki G., Bickenbach J., Cieza A. Which environmental factors are associated with performance when controlling for capacity? J. Rehabil. Med. 2014;46:806–813. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1839. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

10. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 2001;45:5–32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

11. Hothorn T., Buhlmann P., Dudoit S., Molinaro A., van der Laan M.J. Survival ensembles. Biostatistics. 2006;7:355–373. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj011. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

12. Strobl C., Boulesteix A.L., Zeileis A., Hothorn T. Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinform. 2007;8:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-25. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

13. R Core Team . R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: 2016. [Google Scholar]

14. Prodinger B., Cieza A., Oberhauser C., Bickenbach J., Üstün T.B., Chatterji S., Stucki G. Toward the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) rehabilitation set: A minimal generic set of domains for rehabilitation as a health strategy. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.030. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

15. Davies G.I., McIver L., Kim Y., Hashizume M., Iddings S., Chan V. Water-borne diseases and extreme weather events in Cambodia: Review of impacts and implications of climate change. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2015;12:191–213. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120100191. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

16. Pascoe E.A., Smart Richman L. Perceived discrimination and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychol. Bull. 2009;135:531–554. doi: 10.1037/a0016059. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

17. Pousada Garcia T., Groba Gonzalez B., Nieto Rivero L., Pereira Loureiro J., Diez Villoria E. Exploring the psychosocial impact of wheelchair and contextual factors on quality of life of people with neuromuscular disorders. Assist. Technol. 2015;27:246–256. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2015.1045996. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

18. Devitt R., Chau B., Jutai J.W. The effect of wheelchair use on the quality of life of persons with multiple sclerosis. Occup. Ther. Health Care. 2004;17:63–79. doi: 10.1080/J003v17n03_05. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

19. Bickenbach J. Universally design social policy: When disability disappears? Disabil. Rehabil. 2014;36:1320–1327. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.932447. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

ABSTRACT

Students’ interest in STEM careers is governed by various factors: (i) family influences, (ii) out-of-school time learning experiences, (iii) inside-of-school learning experiences, and (iii) media influences. Previous studies often investigate the direct influence of these factors, collectively known as environmental factors, on students’ interest in STEM careers.

This study explains the role of self-efficacy on environmental factors that affect students’ interest in STEM careers through a structural equation model.

This study involved 14-year-old secondary school students who were selected based on cluster sampling and a total of 1800 students were chosen. However, only 1485 responses were considered valid for analysis.

Survey design was utilised in the study. Structural equation modelling analysis was used to analyse the data.

The results of the survey demonstrated that the effects of family influences and out-of-school time learning experiences on interest in STEM careers were fully mediated by self-efficacy except for media influences that affected interest both directly and indirectly via self-efficacy (partial mediator). Inside-of-school learning experiences did not affect self-efficacy and interest in STEM careers.

STEM learning experiences through informal modality are better predictors of students’ interest in STEM careers. Improving formal STEM learning is imperative to ensure that STEM careers are promoted to all school students in a systemic manner.