What was the significance of moche vessels?

The Moche were an ancient, Indigenous people of Andean Peru. They are considered to be one of the most influential civilizations of the ancient Americas. Through their art, they conveyed the stories of their people and their beliefs. Fortunately, they left behind an abundance of sophisticated, artistic artifacts to help us better understand their mysterious culture.

The Moche

The Moche or Mochica civilization flourished from 100 until circa 800 CE. Their territory spanned the Northern coast of present-day Peru in South America. Their society consisted of fishermen, weavers, farmers, potters, and artisans. In addition, there were many slaves, servants, warrior-priests, and priestesses. The Moche were non-literate people who used their art as a means of communication.

Artists of the Moche culture depicted narrative scenes on ceramic vessels. In addition, they painted murals expressing their daily life, religious beliefs, and mythologies. They were also great innovators. For example, they built very successful irrigation systems. These transformed their dry, desert landscape into lush and fertile agricultural farmland. They also constructed huacas. These were spectacular pyramid-like structures made from adobe bricks. The Moche used them for rituals, palaces, administrative purposes, and royal burials.

Themes and Iconography in Moche Art

The Moche portrayed a diverse range of themes and icons in their art. Animals were of great importance and often featured in their ceramics and jewelry. Owls, bats, felines, crabs, and other marine creatures were particularly popular. The Moche people believed that owls were powerful creatures who saw through the darkness of death. They also acted as guardians on the journey to the next life. Bats also symbolized death and renewal.

The Moche included scenes with figures and animals from the natural and supernatural worlds. One important deity in Moche art was Ai Apaec, the creator and sky god. He was usually shown with an anthropomorphic face and feline fangs. Another was the Decapitator, the god of darkness. He was usually depicted as half man, half jaguar. The most powerful, however, was Si, the moon goddess. Other popular ceramic effigy figures included musicians, priestesses, and captives.

Moche Ceramics

The Moche culture is recognized for its fascinating, decorative ceramic vessels. These took the shape of humans, animals, and vegetables or plants. Such shapes reflected the most important aspects of Moche culture. Moche potters created thousands of ceramics for everyday, domestic use. They also made others exclusively for the elite and funerary purposes. In fact, certain ceramics are directly connected to sacred religious ceremonies. A good example of such ceramics are portrait vessels.

The early ceramics of the Moche people were sculptural. They depicted humans, supernatural deities, plants, and animals. In fact, some of their portrait vessels were life-sized. They also included very realistic depictions of actual people, primarily leaders or nobility. Later ceramic vessels displayed complex line drawings and the innovative stirrup spout. Evidently, Moche potters often used molds to produce their ceramics. We know this because archaeologists discovered several duplicates at grave sites. Other examples were found in domestic areas.

Moche artisans used a limited palette of earth tones to decorate their ceramics. The primary colors they used were cream, red-brown or red-orange, and black. Their ceramics were painted in slip which they created from a mixture of clay and water. The walls of the vessels were of particular note, being incredibly thin.

Erotic Art

Aside from vessels, the Moche also created housewares. These comprised floreros (flared bowls) jars, goblets, and cups. In addition, hundreds of erotic ceramics were discovered at ancient Moche sites, including spiritual temples and royal tombs. The vessels depicted humans, skeletons, and animals engaged in graphic sexual acts. Upon their discovery, outraged and appalled Spanish colonists destroyed many of these erotic vessels. However, others have survived and offer us more insight into the Moche culture.

Moche Metalwork

The Moche people were phenomenal metallurgists. In fact, they were pioneers in gilding and soldering metal techniques. They created a wide range of decorative, ceremonial objects, tools, weapons, and jewelry. Many of these were cast in gold, silver, and copper. In addition, they incorporated semiprecious stones and spondylus shells (spiny scallops) into their designs.

Moche artisans created decorative objects to adorn the body. Such objects included necklaces, nose ornaments, earrings, bracelets, and headdresses. Many of these elaborate ornaments were discovered in royal tombs of the Moche elite. Also found there were several tumi knives. The tumi knife was a popular ritual object in Moche culture. It was usually created in metal and had a half-crescent-shaped blade. Sometimes the maker decorated the handle with a figure or animal. Some scholars believe that tumi knives were used in special ceremonies that involved human sacrifice.

Moche Mural Paintings

The murals the Moche people painted depicted scenes from everyday life. We see scenes of fishing and hunting activities, war, mythology, and sacrificial rituals. In addition, murals often portrayed warriors with their prisoners, priests, and supernatural beings.

Murals were painted on interiors and exteriors of religious temples and residences. They created the paint for these murals from mineral pigments such as iron oxides and natural clays. Several paintings have been discovered at important Moche cultural sites. Amongst the more famous are Panamarca, Huaca de la Luna (Temple of the Moon), and Huaca del Sol (Temple of the Sun).

Moche Textiles

For Moche weavers, the primary raw material was cotton. However, skilled weavers also wove textiles from vicuna or alpaca wool. The weavers also created complex designs and patterns for garments and accessories. However, very few Moche textiles survive today. Those that have been recovered were preserved in Moche funerary chambers.

Where to See Moche Art Today

The Moche culture mysteriously disappeared. Some archaeologists believe the Moche’s demise was linked to climate change. Others think that they might have fled their land before being defeated. However, we are able to experience and learn about the Moche today through their incredible artworks that have survived centuries. Moche art objects can be found in several museums. Others reside in private collections throughout the world. Some of the largest collections are at Museo Larco in Lima, Peru, and The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York. Another is at The Harvard Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

DailyArt Magazine needs your support. Every contribution, however big or small, is very valuable for our future. Thanks to it, we will be able to sustain and grow the Magazine. Thank you for your help!

Walter Lehmann and Dr. Heinrich Doering, Kunstgeschichte des Alten Peru (Verlag Ernst Wasmuth A.G., 1924), pg. 81 (ill.).
Heinrich U. Doering, Old Peruvian Art (E. Weyhe, 1936), pg. 14 (ill.).
Heinrich U. Doering, “Portrats der Vorzeit,” Atlantis (October 1936), pp. 598-607 (ill.).
Heinrich Ubbelohde-Doering, The Art of Ancient Peru (Praeger, 1952), pp. 222-223 (ill.).
Heinrich Ubbelohde-Doering, The Art of Ancient Peru, 2nd ed. (Praeger, 1954), pp. 222-223 (ill.).
Junius B. Bird, “Art and Life in Old Peru: An Exhibition,” Curator: The Museum Journal vol. 2 (1962), pp. 196-197, fig. 46 (ill.).
Allen Wardwell, Primitive Art in the Collections of the Art Institute of Chicago (Art Institute of Chicago, 1965), no. 17 (ill.).
Walter Lehmann and Heinrich Doering, The Art of Old Peru, reissued (Hacker Art Books, 1975), pg. 81 (ill.).
Richard Townsend, “Deciphering the Nazca World: Ceramic Images from Ancient Peru,” Art Institute of Chicago Museum Studies 11, 2 (Spring 1985), pp. 117–139 (ill.).
James N. Wood, Treasures from The Art Institute of Chicago (Art Institute of Chicago, 2000), pg. 31 (ill.).
Dorothy Chaplik, Latin American Arts and Cultures (Davis Publications, 2000) (ill.).
Pam Crabtree and Douglas Campana, Archaeology and Prehistory (McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2001) (ill.).
Brian Fagan, In the Beginning: An Introduction to Archeology, 10th ed. (Pearson Education, 2001).
John P. McKay, A History of World Societies (Houghton Mifflin, 2003).
Art Institute of Chicago, The Essential Guide, revised ed. (Art Institute of Chicago, 2003), p. 12 (ill.).
Elizabeth P. Benson, et al., Retratos: 2,000 Years of Latin American Portraits, exh. cat. (San Antonio Museum of Art/Yale University Press, 2004), pg. 66 (ill.).
Pam Crabtree and Douglas Campana, Exploring Prehistory: How Archaeology Reveals Our Past, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2005), (ill.).
Brian Fagan, In the Beginning: An Introduction to Archaeology, 11th ed. (Pearson Education, 2005) (ill.).
Hugh Honour and John Fleming, A World History of Art, 7th ed. (Laurence King Publishing, 2005) (ill.).
John P McKay, A History of World Societies, 7th ed. (Houghton Mifflin Company, 2005) (ill.).
Thomas Buser, Experiencing Art Around Us, 2nd ed. (Wadsworth, 2006) (ill.).
Art Institute of Chicago, Pocket Guide (Art Institute of Chicago, 2009), pg. 3 (ill.).
Art Institute of Chicago, The Essential Guide, 3rd. ed. (Art Institute of Chicago, 2009), pg. 18 (ill.).
Christopher B. Donnan, “Moche Ceramic Portraits,” in Studies in the History of Art, vol. 63, Symposium Papers XL: Moche Art and Archaeology in Ancient Peru, 2001 (National Gallery of Art, 2002), 126; 131 fig. 9 (ill.)
Art Institute of Chicago, The Essential Guide, 4th ed. (Art Institute of Chicago, 2013), pg. 18 (ill.).
Richard Townsend with Elizabeth Pope. 2016. Indian Art of the Americas at the Art Institute of Chicago. Art Institute of Chicago and Yale University Press, pp. 322-323, cat. 285 (ill.).

Art Institute of Chicago, Arts of the Ancient Peru: The Eduard Gaffron Collection, 1955, no cat.
New York, The American Museum of Natural History, Art and Life in Old Peru: An Exhibition, from Sept. 1961, no cat.; exhibition overview published in journal Curator: The Museum Journal (1962), fig. 46 (ill.).
San Antonio Museum of Art, Retratos: 2,000 Years of Latin American Portraits, Feb. 4-Apr. 30, 2006; traveled to El Museo del Barrio, N.Y., Dec. 3, 2004–Mar. 20, 2005, Diego Museum of Art, Apr. 16–July 12, 2005; Bass Museum of Art, Miami Beach, Fla., July 23–Oct. 2, 2005, National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution, Wash. D.C, Oct. 21, 2005–Jan. 8, 2006, cat. pg. 66.

Eduard Gaffron (1861–1931), Lima, Peru, from 1892 to 1912, then Berlin, from 1912 [History of the Department report (Joanne Behrens, 1985) and correspondence in curatorial file]; by descent to his children Mercedes Gaffron, Berlin then Durham, SC, and Hans Gaffron (1902–1979), Berlin then Chicago [correspondence and documentation of the Gaffron Collection in curatorial file]; sold to the Art Institute, 1955.