Why is this considered evidence that the power of regional governments was growing at the expense of the Zhou central government?

1. Vallentyne JR. Infusing ecology into politics. Aquat Ecosyst Health. 1999; 2(2):83–90. 10.1080/14634989908656943 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

2. Oelschlaeger RBM. Wisdom in the Open Air: The Norwegian Roots of Deep Ecology by Peter Reed; David Rothenberg. Env Hist Rev. 1995;19(2):92–94. 10.2307/3984836 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

3. Nepal P. Ecopolitics and ideology relocating green themes in modern ideological thinking. Indian J Political S.2004; 65(4): 603–619. //www.jstor.org/stable/41856079 [Google Scholar]

4. Brulle RJ. Habermas and green political thought: Two roads converging. Environ Polit. 2002; 11(4):1–20. 10.1080/714000651 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

5. Meyer JM. Political theory and the environment. Oxford Hdb Political. 2008. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548439.003.0042 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

6. Wong JK. A dilemma of green democracy. Political Studies. 2016; 64(1):136–155. 10.1111/1467-9248.12189 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

7. Doherty B, de Geus M. Democracy and Green Political Thought. London: Routledge; 1996. 10.4324/9780203449554 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

8. Li H, Zhou LA. Political turnover and economic performance: the incentive role of personnel control in china. J Pubilc Econ. 2003; 89(9–10):1743–1762. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.009 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

9. Ran R. Perverse incentive structure and policy implementation gap in China's local environmental politics. J Environ Pol Plan. 2013; 15(1): 17–39. 10.1080/1523908X.2012.752186 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

10. Saward M. Must democrats be environmentalists? European Political S. 1996. //wrap.warwick.ac.uk/51772/ [Google Scholar]

11. Belinda D. A Brief Cosmogeny of the West German Green Party. German Politics Soc. 2015; 33(4):53–65. 10.3167/gps.2015.330405 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

12. Leonard Liam. A challenging transformation: the Irish Green Party's emergence into power. Irish J Sociology. 2010, 18(1):43–65. [Google Scholar]

13. Carter Neil. The Green Party: Emerging from the Political Wilderness? Brit Polit. 2008; 3(2):223–240. [Google Scholar]

14. Dalby S. Ecopolitical discourse: 'environmental security' and political geography. Prog Hum Geog. 1992; 16(4): 503–522. 10.1177/030913259201600401 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

15. Warner R. Ecological modernisation theory: towards a critical ecopolitics of change? Environ Polit. 2010; 19(4): 538–556. 10.1080/09644016.2010.489710 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

16. Sherzer J. Discourse‐centered approach to language and culture. Am Anthropo.1987; 89(2):295–309. 10.1525/aa.1987.89.2.02a00010 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

17. Song J, Tang M. Ecological discourse analysis from the perspective of systemic functional linguistics. Destech Trans Soc. 2020. 10.12783/dtssehs/icesd2020/34131 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

18. Heilbroner RL. Second thoughts on the human prospect. Challenge. 1975; 18(2):21–28. 10.1080/05775132.1975.11470114 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

19. Heilbroner RL. Business civilization in decline. Norton. 1976. 10.2307/2148965 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

20. Tolga G. Bioethics and authoritarian discourse. Turkiye Biyoetik Der. 2016; 3(2):54–65. 10.5505/tjob.2016.63835 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

21. Frederick F. Ecology and the politics of scarcity. Environ Ethics. 1977; 4(1):85–87. 10.5840/enviroethics19824142 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

22. Paehlke R. Environmental values for a sustainable society: the democratic challenge. Greening Env Policy. 1995. 10.1007/978-1-137-08357-9_8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

23. Irvin RA, Stansbury J. Citizen participation in decision making: is it worth the effort? Public Admin Rev. 2004; 64(1): 55–65. 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

24. Hajer MA. The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process. Global Environ Chang. 1995. 10.1016/S0959-3780(97)82909-3 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

25. Zhang X. Fiscal decentralization and political centralization in China: Implications for growth and inequality. J Comp Econ. 2006; 34(4):713–726. 10.1016/j.jce.2006.08.006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

26. Zhou F, Tan M. Erratum to: Relationship between the Central Government and Local Governments of Contemporary China. Soc Dev Exper China. 2017. 10.1007/978-981-10-4388-8_8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

27. Cheng-Bo XU, Wei Z, Jia-Xin X, et al. The Analysis on Reasons and Costs of Chinese Economic Growth: From the Perspectives of Politics and Society. J Kunming U. 2012. 10.5772/26629 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

28. Han L, Kung KS. Fiscal Incentives and Policy Choices of Local Governments, Evidence from China. HKUST IEMS Working Paper. 2015; 116:89–104. 10.2139/ssrn.2607777 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

29. Li B. Top-down place-based competition and award: local government incentives for non-GDP improvement in China. J Chin Gov. 2018; 3(4):1–22. 10.1080/23812346.2018.1516418 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

30. Montinola G, Weingast QBR. Federalism, Chinese Style: The Political Basis for Economic Success in China. World Politics. 1995; 48(1):50–81. 10.1353/wp.1995.0003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

31. Dobson A. Citizenship and the Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003. 10.1093/0199258449.001.0001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

32. Escobar A. Construction nature: Elements for a post-structuralist political ecology. Futures. 1996; 28(4):325–343. 10.1093/0199258449.001.0001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

33. Saward M. Postmodernists, pragmatists and the justification of democracy. Econ Soc. 1994. 10.1080/03085149400000003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

34. Newman J, Barnes M, Sullivan H, Knops A. Public Participation and Collaborative Governance. J Soc Policy. 2004; 33(2): 203–223. 10.1017/S0047279403007499 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

35. Dupraw ME, Brennan BV, Placht MT. RESEARCH ARTICLES: Case Study: Collaborative Governance as a Tool for Natural Resource Management in China and the United States. Environ Prac. 2013; 15(03):228–239. 10.1017/S1466046613000240 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

36. Kuhn B. Collaborative Governance for Sustainable Development in China. Open J Political Sci. 2016; 6(4):433–453. 10.4236/ojps.2016.64037 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

37. Raizer L. Anthony giddens and the politics of climate change. Sociologias. 2010;13(26):364–369. 10.1590/S1517-45222011000100014 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

38. Dahl RA, Simon HA. Administrative behavior: a study of decision-making process in administrative organization. Admin Sci Quart. 1957; 2(2):244 10.2307/2390693 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

39. Ocasio W. Toward an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Manage J. 1998; 18:187–206. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+3.0.CO;2-K [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

40. Stone CN, Henig JR, Jones BD, Pierannunzi C. Building Civic Capacity: The Politics of Reforming Urban Schools. Studies Govt Public. 2001. 10.2307/3219898 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

41. Kahn ME, Kotchen MJ. Business cycle effects on concern about climate change: the chilling effect of recession. Clim Chang Econ. 2011; 02 10.1142/S2010007811000292 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

42. Zheng S, Wu J, Kahn ME, Deng Y. The nascent market for "green" real estate in beijing. European Ec Rev. 2012; 56(5):974–984. 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.02.012 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

43. Wei W, Guo C, Chen J, Zhang Z. Textual topic evolution analysis based on term co-occurrence: A case study on the government work report of the State Council (1954–2017). In 2017 12th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering (ISKE) (pp. 1–6).2017: IEEE. 10.1109/ISKE.2017.8258735 [CrossRef]

44. Lowie RH. Methods and principles: language; an introduction to the study of speech. Am Anthropo. 1923; 25(1). 10.1525/aa.1923.25.1.02a00060 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

45. Brysbaert M, New B. Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4): 977–990. 10.3758/brm.41.4.977 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

46. State Council’s Work Reports. Available online: //www.gov.cn/guowuyuan/zfgzbg.htm.

47. Documents of Provincial Governments. Available online: //leaders.people.com.cn/GB/70158/400473/#3.

48. Installation instructions and program code. Available online: //github.com/fxsjy/jieba.

49. Nasukawa T. Text analysis and knowledge mining system. Eighth International Symposium on Natural Language Processing. IEEE, 2009.

Page 2

Framework of the authoritarian & democratic ecopolitical discourse.

AuthoritarianDemocratic
Views on ecologyNature is subordinate to human society; the social and political pattern of "center-edge"Equality of human, nature social problems; fairness and justice; competition and cooperation
Decision-maker of the generation of knowledgeAdministrative state; technical bureaucrat; expertCitizens; stakeholders
Rules of discourse formationTechnical narrativesNetworking narratives
The way to objectify knowledgePublic interest under technical narratives; authority's discourse rightExpectations for consensus; acknowledge the existence of difference

Postingan terbaru

LIHAT SEMUA