What approach should teachers take in giving feedback to students about their math performance?

We’re trained to believe that feedback is generally a good thing. It’s crucial in helping us develop new skills and in scenarios where we cannot assess our own performance. In fact, feedback ranks in the top 5-10 highest influences on student achievement, which explains why it’s a foundation of learning from the earliest grades when students compete for teacher praise or gold star stickers. The more feedback the better, right?

Unfortunately, research shows that the impact of feedback varies significantly depending on its focus and context. Much of the feedback that teachers give to students is ineffective or in some cases, detrimental to their learning. A review of 131 studies on feedback found that over a third of feedback interventions actually decreased performance. Well-intentioned educators regularly provide comments to students that decrease students’ intrinsic motivation and discourage them from learning.

This is especially worrisome given the importance of feedback when students are mastering complex tasks such as problem-solving and analysis. Unlike situations where students are purely being asked to memorize and recall information, deeper learning requires the student to reflect on the cognitive process and understand the strategies that lead to successful performance. Feedback is crucial to this metacognitive awareness. If our goal is merely for students to remember facts (“Who were the Axis powers in World War II?”), then letting the student know if the answer is right or wrong will suffice. But if we want students to think about the interplay of ideas (“To what extent was the outbreak of World War II inevitable?”), then we need to give students robust feedback that guides their thinking.  

Luckily, cognitive science offers valuable insight into providing the right feedback to support student outcomes. We’ve combed through the research to figure out the most important elements of actionable, effective feedback for deeper learning.

What approach should teachers take in giving feedback to students about their math performance?

Research shows us the most important elements of feedback to enhance deeper learning.

1. Emphasize the task, not the student’s ability

Feedback that attributes performance results to inherent traits like intelligence does the most harm to student outcomes. Comments like, “you’re so smart” or “you are an excellent writer” suggest to students that their work is a reflection of their own selves, and that it is their egos that are being judged rather than the quality of their work. This type of feedback directs attention away from the task at hand and toward the self. The student is no longer thinking about the skill or content knowledge he or she is trying to master; instead, the student is thinking about his or her own ego.

In cases where the student receives negative feedback related to the self (“I don’t think that math is your strong suit”), the student generally loses motivation to persevere in the learning process. In cases where the feedback related to the self is positive (“you are a natural analytical thinker”), the feedback causes student to stray away from challenges because he or she wants to protect his or her good reputation by avoiding failure.

To foster a growth mindset and encourage students to take risks to further their learning, feedback needs to be directed at a specific task rather than the student’s ability. Instead of commenting on the student’s “writing talent”, it’s best to point out something relevant to the actual task (“you’ve done an excellent job supporting your argument with evidence from the text.”) This keeps the student’s focus on the learning task while diminishing the effects on his or her ego.

2. Give specific guidance on how to improve

Non-specific feedback is of little use to students, particularly if they are trying to figure out how to master a complex task. Telling a student that he or she has done a “good job!” or needs to “try harder” does not inspire the student to reflect on the cognitive process or figure out how to produce different results going forward. In terms of the measurable impact on student outcomes, non-specific feedback such as praise, rewards, and punishment falls far behind feedback that is specific and geared toward a particular task.

Imagine if you were trying to master a new skill, such as perfecting a free throw in basketball. After several failed attempts to get the ball in the hoop, you finally manage to score. Would it be more beneficial to hear the coach yell “Excellent!” across the court, or would it be better to know exactly why this shot was successful, unlike the previous ones? (“Yes! You bent your wrist 90 degrees before you flicked it, and that made all the difference.”) Taking the time to specify what the student did right or wrong enables the student to succeed when the same strategy or skill is applied in the future.

Of course, giving insightful feedback about the learning process requires understanding the student’s thinking and use of strategies. Some forms of assessment are better suited to this than others. In deciding between a short-answer or a multiple-choice question, the teacher might consider the value of students generating their own original words and reflecting their thought process in their answer. Gaining more visibility into the student’s thinking is what enables teachers to provide the most impactful feedback.

3. Provide regular, ongoing feedback

Most students do not receive nearly as much feedback as they need. In a typical classroom, the incidence of feedback is measurable in seconds per day. Most of the students’ time is spent working alone, which is understandable given the number of students that a single teacher must interact with. But for students who are consistently making the same mistakes without knowing it, infrequency of feedback results in wasted time and frustration.

Efforts to correct this situation generally result in more assessment that gives students information about performance results (scores and grades) rather than insight into the learning process. This is due to the practical constraints of having many students and limited teacher resources. Giving students feedback on their learning behavior and thought process requires a level of individualized attention that teachers in a typical classroom are unable to provide. Handing out more multiple choice questions that can be graded by a machine and reported back to the student often seems like the only option.

Resolving this feedback gap requires thinking beyond the traditional classroom model where teachers are solely responsible for providing feedback via grades and comments. Are there ways for students to gain insight into their own learning process that do not require the teacher’s intervention? Can data on digital platforms be used as a means to provide more frequent and actionable feedback? Could sharing notes and answers enable students to learn from one another and provide peer review? Research on self- and peer-assessment has shown that giving students opportunities to assess their own learning results in greater academic gains and deeper reflection about the learning process. Leveraging students’ abilities to assess their own cognitive process may allow them to think more carefully about the strategies they employ and help them develop their own metacognition for future learning.

4. Focus on process, not results

Too often, assessment in the classroom is used to determine student proficiency instead of inspiring reflection about the cognitive process. We measure student outcomes without understanding how those outcomes came about or what they entail for instruction and student learning. Optimizing feedback requires rethinking the way we assess students.

One starting point might be giving students the opportunity to revise their incorrect answers. In student surveys, we consistently find that one of the most popular features of Actively Learn is the “retry answer” button. Students want to improve and get a second chance to try a different approach to answering a question. Teachers who encourage students to retry their answers send students the message that learning is about reflection and practice rather than mere performance outcomes.

Giving thoughtful feedback that informs deeper learning also enables teachers to improve their instruction. When teachers focus on the learning process rather than performance outcomes, feedback becomes a two-way channel. While a student is the one who “gets” a grade, insight into the learning process informs student learning and also involves the teacher in figuring out the best way to direct students to academic success. It challenges the teacher to diagnose the causes of student performance and play an active role in redirecting the student’s thinking process.

Conclusion

As with so many aspects of teaching, feedback is both an art and a science. Cognitive research can point us in the right direction, but the teacher is still ultimately the diagnostician who figures out how to best help a student. We hope you are able to implement these best practices in a way that furthers your students' growth and leads to deeper learning.

RELATED:

Formative Assessment: Tracking Student Learning in Real Time

Providing feedback is just one of the many jobs that teachers do to help guide students onto the path of success. It is essential as it can give a better explanation as to how a student is doing rather than just a mark on some paper.

Comprehensive feedback allows the student to think critically about the choices they have given and consider a point of view they may not have done so originally. Teachers should take the time to know how to deliver feedback effectively in a way that allows students to do just this.

What is Good Feedback For Students?

Feedback to students in a classroom, is the practice of communicating how well a student’s performance on an assignment or test was.

  • Good feedback is being able to do it effectively so that the student understands and takes your feedback and comments on-board
  • Good feedback uses words that aren’t necessarily negative, but more descriptive and genuine in a way that a student wouldn’t feel the need to be sad or defensive.
  • Feedback should be very specific to the student and written in a way you know they will understand.
  • Good feedback should be administered to a student in response to their work in a timely fashion, and not delivered so late that the student doesn’t even remember the answers they’ve given or why!

What approach should teachers take in giving feedback to students about their math performance?

How to Provide Feedback

There are a few different ways to approach the feedback process:

1. Be Affirmative On What is Right

Feedback is never just about the negatives. It should always include the positives and reassure students that they’re on the right path with their thinking. This means avoiding sweeping generalisations like “Good work!” Even if it is good work, you should take the time to explain what made it so.

An example would be mentioning on a student’s paper that you liked the level of detail that they gave, or that you particularly noticed they used their time wisely on a project.

2. Correcting and Explaining

This is the most popular form of feedback because it works, and mistakes need to be corrected. It is inevitable that students will make mistakes. It’s part of learning! But instead of marking a big ‘X’ and going to the next, explain why they got the answer wrong and direct their thought process onto the right path.

A student could be talking about the water cycle but fails to mention what water does to go from one phase to the next. In the feedback, it should be mentioned that they left this out and explained what it is they should have added in their presentation so that everyone can understand what happens.

3. Go Through The Process

Many questions have a thought process behind them, and students are encouraged to show their work to see how they came up with their answer. This allows the teacher to see where the student’s thinking is going. If an answer is wrong, then go through the steps to see if you can determine where it went wrong.

It may be a silly mistake that needs correcting and explaining, but it also may need a better explanation in order to help the student understand the process better, see where they went wrong and prepare them for the next assignment. This is especially helpful with science and mathematics assignments.

4. Self-Feedback

Encourage students to have a look at their own assignments and give themselves feedback, looking at what they can do better next time. This, of course, is only suitable for older students who are experienced and have the eye for looking critically at their own work.

Feedback is necessary and can help students develop. It enhances their learning process and gives them the skills to think critically in the future.

What approach should teachers take in giving feedback to students about their math performance?

Point to Point Education sees some of Australia’s most talented teachers take up teaching roles overseas. This fun and exciting opportunity enriches the lives of both the teacher and students in a very rewarding experience. If you would like to learn more about how you can get a placement teaching abroad, then contact us today for more information.

Apply Now